The BC Liberals are H-iS-T-ory

Written by Brian Revel on August 21st, 2010

A few folks fuming over fiscal fudgery

Photo Credit: News1130

My how the wheels of Justice spin quickly when they need to.

Reading comments in various sources today, it seems to me that the Liberal Government is pretty much sunk over the HST issue. It’s game over. Gordo, throw in the towel. You lied to us one time too many.

Truth to tell, as Value Added Taxes go, the HST is not so bad. So long as neither government raises their portion, 12% tax across the board is manageable. Yes, it will be inflationary for a year but we’ll all get over it. So if it had been presented to us before the last election, I would have probably gone for it.

But the Liberals were less than up-front with us, the voters, over a lot of things in the last election. The budget was looking to be more-or-less balanced with a mere four hundred million dollar deficit. Not bad considering that the Olympic bill was in the budget. The Canada Line was done. The Port Mann Bridge bill was starting to run up and the Sea-to-Sky Highway tab was in too.

“No worries”, said the finance minister as we went to the polls. “HST? Never!” scoffed the premier. And then it all changed, literally the day after we had voted this bunch in for another four years.

Jeepers, the books weren’t in such rosy condition after all. “Rosy” was hardly the word for it. “Blood Red” was more like it, and the sanguinous ink has long been flowing “Liberally” from the books. With their majority a mere three days old, the provincial government was approaching Stephen Harper for a bail-out. Despite the adamant statements by the premier in the election campaign to the contrary, the HST was suddenly on the table.

“But if we mentioned the HST during the election, people wouldn’t have voted for us,” or something to that effect, whined Colin Hansen, our-soon-to-be-former finance minister. You are correct, sir. You would have had to deal with the outrage from the electorate over the most non-transparent financing scheme this province has ever seen over the Olympics.

You would have actually had to be accountable for the sham that was VANOC and the IOC’s fiscal Font-That-Spilleth-Over. But at least you would have been honest about the mess we’re in: a mess you Liberals alone are responsible for.

And Colin, to use the “But if we told you before the election” defense merely confirms what we suspect all along; that it was at least discussed sometime, somewhere, before the election in cabinet, if not in caucus.

Yes, people would not have voted for you but believe me when I say this: You made your bed and it was damned well time you slept in it.

The whining aside, could it be said that Hansen’s lament was along the same lines as “An election is no time to discuss policy,” once retorted by Canada’s most short-lived crash-and-burn prime minister, another Vancouverite Campbell… (a coincidence? a harbinger?)… a Kim, to be exact.

Yes, it could be so said. Both governments were bankrupt- literally. Both had spent themselves drunk and both had introduced the whole concept of the GST/HST. Both avoided taking on serious issues during the election- issues that might have cost them votes.

The similarities end there though.

The Progressive Conservative government had nothing to lose. The stench from the leadership of Brian Mulroney was more reviled than bottled water from Chernobyl. As it was, after the election there were all of two members left, down from its initial majority of 211 out of 282. Joe (Who) Clark and Elsie Wayne were all that was left. A little “debate” might have saved a seat or two. Maybe.

But here, the provincial Liberals were destined to win another term. If only they had been straight with the voters. If only they had stepped up to the microphones and said,”Folks, with the Olympics we’ve had a hell of a party. You were right- it was expensive. Here’s the tab… and here’s how we’re going to pay for it. Bring on the HST.” They might have lost a few more seats. But they would have held on to a majority. They would have done it honestly and had their cherished HST fair and square.

And I- and many others- would have kept our names off the petition.

But as it was, we were lied to. Plain and simple. There’s no wiggle room here.

This is why the Liberals deserve every kick in the proverbial teeth they get now.

They have lost the confidence of the electorate on a money bill. Forget the Initiative. Heck, forget the Legislature. The legitimacy and moral right of this government to govern is lost. Even the role and responsibilities of the Legislature delegated to it by the province’s population have been revoked.

How pathetic- our entire democratic system held up for judgement in court, the Legislature’s opposition politicians there cap-in-hand- supplicants all of them-before a single judge and holding their breath for days, over some sue-happy business coalition’s motion to quash it all. How utterly, miserably, sad that our democratic system is reduced to this.

The government ought to resign, the Legislature dissolved, and a general election held.

But that won’t happen. The government will soldier on, now under the threat of recall- and I’ll be there to help out in that campaign. And so, when the next election does come along, it will be interesting to see who of the caucus survives. Most did after the BC Rail sell-off lie so no doubt they’ll give it a good college try.

And why not? The Official Opposition is just as toothless and illegitimate as the government. Since the population did what it had to do out on the streets by itself, it showed that the opposition is just a bunch of johnny-come-lately opportunists and that the Legislature is completely irrelevant when it comes to taking on these banditos in Victoria. The Establishment on both sides of Leg in this province ought to be relieved there is no Bastille waiting to be stormed.

Don’t expect the Official Opposition to be calling for an election. No siree. Wouldn’t want to unleash some of your very able blood-hounds like Farnworth and Krog on the Liberals and upset the delicate brownie-and-greenie balance inside the coalition of ‘play-nice’ sycophants you’ve managed to placate, would you, Carole?

How disgraced I would feel today if I were a provincial politician no matter my colour. A pox on all their houses, thank you. And a rousing cheer for the People, the real heros in this debacle.

And so as court cases go, this was a decisive win for the anti-HST crowd, and a decisive loss for the Liberals and all those who support them- especially those who tried to derail the petition in court.

But the court win was no win for Democracy. Instead it was a judge, a sensible one for a change, who decided to get the hell out of the way of this freight train. He realized that if he were to try to stop it, who knows what kind of People’s Rage the courts might have had to endure. Judges aren’t viewed too kindly in this province already for their milque-toast verdicts and sentences these days.

As an aside, it must be observed that if only in this fleeting moment, we saw revealed in the stark light of the courtroom who is the real coalition behind this BC Liberal government. Too bad for the business coalition, relying on such a corrupt and inept bunch of pathetic losers that is their government to do their bidding, that they had to come out from the cloak of darkness to take on the Zalm Forces themselves.

Oh no- As an afterthought does this mean that BC’s de facto Opposition Leader, Bill Vander Zalm, is really back? Like, for real? Is he going to try to be ‘preeeemier‘ again? Wouldn’t that be fantaaaastic?

Ugh. Let me think about that one and get back to you.

Share
 

Bye Bye Canuckleheads!

Written by Brian Revel on May 12th, 2010

In this town, this is quite an admission: I am not a Canucks fan. I suppose I was once, when I knew of no other team.

But I guess they were the local club I rooted for until about 2000 when I took my dad to a Canucks / Flames game at GM Place. The tickets cost me about a full-week’s salary- about 1/52 of my entire year’s income. We sat a few rows back from the ice, behind the net so the seats weren’t even the best in the house.

This exorbitant price was what I paid for the privilege to watch a bunch of millionaires skate. That’s all they did. It wasn’t merely disappointing; it was infuriatingly appalling. Anytime the puck got close to a Vancouver Canuck, he simply batted the offending puck out of the way. Now at exactly the same time, on exactly the same sheet of ice, the Calgary Flames did what they came to do. They played hockey. Not surprisingly, Calgary won the game, 8-1.

I may not be an avid Canucks fan- you could even say I am as much an expert in hockey as I am in nuclear physics- but my opinions on this most important Vancouver issue have, to date, stood the test of time. The rest of this entry is what I believe is so wrong with the Canucks.

Most recently, Vancouver has not been able to break into the finals or even semi-finals because of three things.

First, the Vancouver Canucks play with no heart. The entire enterprise is set up to make money- who cares about the hockey, really? Given the number of times the franchise has changed its colours and logo in recent years, I would suggest that the organization makes almost as much money selling official merchandise as it does selling tickets.

Their on-ice performance that fateful day in 2000 was representative of their spotty drive to win. Their last game this past week was yet another example of lacklustre heart. Why does this happen? Are our “stars” afraid of breaking a fingernail? Or do they all suffer from collective depression?

Second, Vancouver suffers from the “Magic Bullet” Principle. Dating back over 10 years, that’s 10 long, losing, seasons, Canucks fans have oogled over one super-star followed by another- each being the solution to the team’s woes. “Yeah, the last star we imported was a prima-donna dud, but this guy, he’s going to get the Canucks into the finals!”

First it was Pavel Bure. Then it was Marc Messier. How about the Sedin twins? And most recently it was Robert Luongo. Even Todd Burtuzzi, convicted thug that he was, was a ‘star’ in this perennial parade of pathetic performers. What about good old-fashioned team effort and grunt?

Finally, and most damning, it seems that the Canucks suffer from Springtime Golf Syndrome. While I don’t know for certain, I would suggest that as the fairways dry out, our boys of ice head to the putting greens and driving ranges. They get distracted. Little white balls and warm sunny days start to lure them from the cold ice and the disciplined humdrum of hockey practice.

While this year was slightly different in that there was no big break between their play-off rounds which always seem to do them in, the time of year is not a coincidence. But for the future, this last concern could be eliminated if they ‘rest’ between rounds in Yellowknife- or better yet- Inuvik.

So even when they- should they- ever win the Stanley Cup, I am completely convinced that it will be a total fluke unless they have overcome these three crucial yet basic criticisms.

But good luck on that one.

With rabid fans so willing to support such incredible mediocrity and a management team willing to sign ‘magic bullets’ into contracts that will ensure the player’s great-great-great grandchildren can afford Ferraris they day they turn 16, somehow I think I’ll be six feet under long before they get their act together.

As an aside, the Vancouver Giants is still my preferred local team. In five seriously important key categories: Grunt, Heart, Guts, Consistency, and a Ticket-Price-That-I-Can-Afford, they are a much superior team to the Canucks. Speaking of whom, did I mention consistency?

As for the Stanley Cup in 2010…. OK- Let’s Go les Habs! Play like the winners you are. Show our Canucklehead players- and fans- how it’s done.

Share
 

The IOC admits to Bullying?

Written by Brian Revel on December 28th, 2009

The IOC kicks London around

A symbol of the IOC

Recently on television in Vancouver, the host city of the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, we have seen a superb animation ad of five super-giant athletes pulling on ropes, pulling the continents together. When they’ve finished, they do a “Hi-Five” over Egypt.

View it here: IOC – All Together Now

The Olympic Spirit Unites the world, implies the ad, sponsored by the IOC. Their goal is laudable enough. Yet one cannot help but notice a serious symbolic sub-text in the advertisement that also rings true. There is no other way to put it: The IOC is a bully.

You see, as the giant-athletes pick up the ropes they are about to pull on, they stomp heavily and without regard to where they are stepping. One blocks traffic, almost killing a driver. Another smashes her foot into a little village called “London” and, in bracing her foot on Big Ben, she  pushes the Houses of Parliament and nearby businesses aside, nearly crushing a double-decker bus.

There’s even a hockey player bracing himself against the rooftops of Yaletown after he’s crashed his way down our streets in the same way Godzilla would- much to the consternation of a local businessman and residents depicted in the video.

The herculean efforts of the IOC’s giant-athletes wantonly displace ordinary citizens, ordinary people, going about their everyday lives. And these giants are so big their actions can only go unopposed; they act with impunity, just as the IOC seems to do in real life.

The IOC, symbolically  represented by these giant athletes is telling us all, “We are bigger than any piddly town. We are more powerful than any stupid country. Our lofty goal of bringing the world together outranks any local interest, anywhere, and no matter the cause. Local communities are nothing to us and we don’t give a damn about what you think or how you feel.”

How could they have missed such a symbolic message, these high-powered international snobs, if they didn’t mean it? Marie Antoinette could not have said it better: “Let them eat Cake!“ Given the events here in Vancouver over recent months involving the IOC and VANOC, the Vancouver Organizing Committee, it’s hard to miss this sub-text.

Here are four examples: a local business here in Vancouver, the Olympia Restaurant on Denman Street, was a fervent supporter of the Olympics coming to town. As a business, they have been around for decades and there had been no objection to the business being named “Olympia”. Suddenly, since Vancouver won the “Olympic” franchise in 2003, Olympia Pizza has been fighting a David and Goliath battle to keep their name and stay in business. They’ve held out so far- but at what expense?

Want to learn more about their plight? Check out http://998denman.com.

Then there was the Paramedic strike. Ambulance workers across British Columbia struck in March of this year. Their issues centered around staffing. In November the British Columbia government introduced legislation to end the strike and it turns out that VANOC and the IOC were behind the government’s initiative… using thinly veiled threats. As repugnant as the legislation was, it appears that the provincial government’s hands were tied.

A third example is the refusal to consider women ski jumping the 2010 Winter Olympics. The jumpers took the IOC and VANOC to court. And while the court found that keeping women out of the competition was discriminatory in Canada there was nothing the court could do because VANOC was merely an organizing committee and the IOC was based outside of this country. It was therefore not subject to Canadian law.

By the way, if you would like to support these world-class ski-jumping athletes to participate in the Winter Olympics, go to their site, www.wsj2010.com and sign their online petition.

My final example although there are many, many more, is that of free speech. One might recall Suharto, when he came to Vancouver and the now infamous APEC summit, the Indonesian despot didn’t want his sightseeing to be marred by demonstrations so for his convenience, protestors were muzzled and tear-gassed.

And so it is with the Olympics. In Canada, with free speech enshrined in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, signs posted in private residential windows protesting the games could be cause enough for the police to force their way in and remove the offending posters. And we are going to have Beijing-style “free speech zones” safely isolated from the Olympic action.

The goal of bringing the world closer together is a good one. Indeed, a significant majority affirmed the Olympic ideal when they endorsed Vancouver’s bid in a referendum.

But trampling on local communities along the way is not so good. And our experience here in Vancouver reinforces the fact that the IOC simply doesn’t care about the communities it is directly affecting. If a referendum were held today, Vancouverites would reject the games two to one.

This ad precisely demonstrates the IOC’s calloused treatment of its host cities. All in a pretty- and slick- one minute animated announcement. Watch out London- you’re next.

So thanks, IOC, for confirming what Vancouverites, many of them supporters, current and former, of the upcoming winter games, have come to believe. That the IOC is a corrupt, money-hungry boys-club, answerable and responsible to no one; that it is the ultimate aristocracy- one that deserves to be knocked down a peg or two.

Oh- and someone has knocked them down a peg. Check out Lululemon’s fab new line of sports-like wear called, and introduced to coincide with, “a Major Sporting Event Taking Place in British Columbia between 2009 and 2011″. Their jab the eye of the IOC and VANOC sums up many peoples’ sentiment exactly.

I, for one, will be buying my mitts from The Bay, the official supplier of Olympic clothing, but I’ll get my touque from Lululemon- the unofficial Aristocrat shin-kicker of the people.

Play
Share
 

On Vancouver’s Streets

Written by Brian Revel on December 3rd, 2009

BC Hydro's Vandalism at Richards & Dunsmuir

BC Hydro's Vandalism at Richards & Dunsmuir

In my line of work, I come across a lot of road-works. Truthfully, they are the bane of my existence at work. The extensive road closures and worse, the delays in traffic that are associated with them cause so much aggravation to so many people.

Although road-works are road-works no matter where you are in this world, I have a few opinions regarding how Vancouver manages it’s public works and I am more than happy to share those in the future.

But today, I’d like to speak about the other organizations that dig into our city streets, do their thing, and then fill in the holes.

I’m speaking of the likes of BC Hydro, Terasen Gas, and Telus, and the Metro Vancouver Water District to name just four but I’m sure there are more, given all the other utility-like works that go on.

Why is it that when they finish their work, their road patch is of such poor quality? More to the point, why does the city allow them to do such a bad patch-job?

As I see it, taxpayers paid a lot of money to have the road built and maintained by the city. Too much, even. But then along comes some utility who digs it up, roots around in the hole they made, fills it in, pats a little asphalt down over the top and calls it a day. When they’re done, the finished road surface looks (and feels) like a pothole in reverse! There is not the slightest attempt to smooth the patch out. No matter the utility, the location, or the time of year!

Never mind that there are concrete curbs, concrete sidewalks, and concrete bus-stop pads and areas of brick and cobblestones. It seems that a bad paving-job is good enough for these utilities- as well as the city- which is responsible for the roads in the first place.

In the middle of a concrete curb, the replacement asphalt is ‘moulded’ to resemble the curb. In the middle of ornate brickwork, you’ll find a mounded slab of asphalt. And in the middle of the smoothest pavement in the middle of the street, you’ll find a whacking huge lump that passes for a ‘patch’.

When these guys are finished with our roads, their handy work is so shoddy, so haphazard, it’s plain that they don’t care about the road surface at all. The work is so bad, it’s sure to cause motorists to fear for the well-being of their cars’ suspension systems. Pedestrians must navigate serious tripping hazards. It’s so cheap. And it’s so unnecessary.

When the city digs into a street to fix a sewer pipe, once they’re done, they replace the street’s foundation, tamp it down, put down an underlay of asphalt, and then do a final paving so that the patch blends exactly in with the road surface around it. They pay similar attention to concrete and bricklaying. They may be slow but city’s Street Operations folk do excellent work.

I certain that if a lamp-post is destroyed in a car accident, ICBC pays for it’s replacement. So why is it any different when there’s pre-meditated vandalism on our road surfaces?

This is one way to improve the condition of our streets over time that won’t cost the taxpayer a single dime. Whoever digs the street up, can do what’s necessary to repair the damage; to put it back to the condition it was in before they started their digging.

Our streets have value. It’s time for them to be protected. It’s time for Vancouver to establish and enforce standards on these digger-happy agencies. How the city itself repairs its streets, should be the standard.

Play
Share
 

Hedy’s at it… again

Written by Brian Revel on December 1st, 2009

Hedy4OntarioIt’s been a long time since I’ve posted anything. Today’s going to be different because something caught my eye on my way past the mail box I thought I’d share with you.

Hedy Fry, our Dragon-slayer MP here in Vancouver-Centre (BC), has just mailed out her semi-annual horn-tooting blurb. No surprise there, all MPs can and do. It’s just that hers is, well, unique. Individual. (Read….”Unaligned”).

This newsletter from our Paul Martin lovin’, Liberal-flag wavin’, Queen of Denman Street MP, is completely devoid of anything “Liberal”. Clearly, she must see the party itself as a liability (as would I) given the machinations that are going on right now at Stornaway.

And then, while visiting her website for more ‘updates’, I came across this little gem: a little YouTube video, that was produced on Parliament Hill showing the Honourable member to be from… Ontario! The team support is apalling. Who produced this joke?

It’s 30 seconds long and with all the media brain-power at their disposal on Parliament Hill how could they possibly screw up like this?! Couldn’t someone have said, “Wait, Hedy, you need to do this again…. you blew the opening!”

Every Hour on the Eleventh Hour of the Eleventh… Day of the Eleventh Month….

Every Hour on the Eleventh Hour….. Oops… Take Two! What happened to the days when she had a proud British Columbian Liberal-Flag wavin’ machine? Or is there something about the competence of the Liberals to effect real opposition? Where is the depth of the party to ensure it can sell lemonade on election day never mind a government? Is this one time we should follow Hedy and step back from the edge of a very deep, collapsing Liberal hole?

 

Play
Share